DriveReady
Tier 11.0 h to studyHigh confidenceEasyabout 2.3 questions3.1% of marks

A7 — Data interpretation: tables and charts

1. Why this topic matters here

Expect about 2.3 questions and 2.3 marks on this topic (about 3.1% of the 75 scored marks). It sits in Technical Ability, part of the 25-question aptitude block (Reasoning Ability 15 Q / 25 min + Technical Ability 10 Q / 35 min, one cut-off each). Tier 1, 1.0 hours to reach reliable recall, confidence High.

3 questions on this topic are in the observed Infosys pool (Q03, Q07), from 2 sources. They are listed in §2 and solved in ../question-banks/QB-99-OBSERVED-POOL.md.

Why the tier: expected marks per study hour, weighted by confidence, is 2.31 against a paper average of 1.84 (../data/analysis-tables.md §6). Every section has its own cut-off, so a zero here costs the whole section's chance, not only these marks. There is no calculator. Negative marking: none reported.

2. Exactly what gets asked

Three coaches independently say data interpretation is Infosys's favourite: "there is no exam of Infosys where data interpretation questions is not asked" (YT-2YHL) and "this year more DI questions are getting asked" (YT-2NTB) [REPORTED]. Data is shown as a table or as percentages that you turn into a table, then one or two computations follow.

Sub-pattern How it appears Observed
Frequency table, "percentage less than a value" 400 students in height groups, find the percentage shorter than 170 cm Q03
Percentage shares of a total, pass/fail and gap Marks as % of 400, pass mark 50, find the failed subject and the best–worst difference Q07
Histogram with a pass mark Numbers of students in score ranges, what proportion passed discarded (X02: chart values not recoverable)
Bar data, growth or ratio Output of two plants over five years authored from the pattern

3. Concept notes

3.1 Read the chart before you read the question

Write down: what the numbers are (units, thousands), what the total is, and what each row is a percentage of. Most DI errors are a wrong base, not wrong arithmetic.

3.2 The five calculations that cover almost everything

Question Formula
What percentage is A of B A / B × 100
Percentage change from old to new (new − old) / old × 100
Ratio of A to B A : B, divide both by the HCF
Average total ÷ count
Share of the total part ÷ total × 100

3.3 Percentage charts become tables

If a pie chart says "History 13%" and the total is 400 marks, History = 13% of 400 = 52. Do this for every slice before reading the question; every answer then comes from the table.

3.4 Frequency tables

"How many are shorter than 170 cm" means the groups that end at or below 170, added up. Percentage of the class = that sum ÷ total × 100.

3.5 Approximation

With no calculator, round to round numbers and compare with the options. If options are far apart (77%, 67%, 57%), a rough figure is enough.

4. Must-memorise block

Fraction Percentage Fraction Percentage
1/2 50 1/8 12.5
1/3 33.3 1/10 10
1/4 25 1/12 8.33
1/5 20 1/16 6.25
1/6 16.7 1/20 5
1/7 14.3 3/8 37.5

Always the old value is the base for a change. Percentage points differ from percentage change.

5. Worked examples

Example 1 — frequency table (observed Q03). 400 students: 140–150 cm: 150; 150–160: 88; 160–170: 70; 170–180: 50; 180–190: 42. Shorter than 170 cm = first three groups = 150 + 88 + 70 = 308. 308 / 400 = 77%. Sanity check: 150 + 88 + 70 + 50 + 42 = 400 ✓.

Example 2 — shares of a total (observed Q07). Total 400. English 25%, Hindi 34%, Maths 18%, Science 10%, History 13%. Marks: English 100, Hindi 136, Maths 72, Science 40, History 52. Pass mark 50 → fails in Science only. Best − worst = 136 − 40 = 96. (The recalled stem says "out of 100", which Hindi's 136 contradicts; the answer holds on the chart data.)

Example 3 — quarterly sales. Sales in thousands: Q1 120, Q2 150, Q3 135, Q4 180. Total = 585.

  • Growth Q1 → Q2: (150 − 120) / 120 × 100 = 25%.
  • Average = 585 / 4 = 146.25.
  • Share of Q4 in the year = 180 / 585 × 100 = 30.77% (4/13).
  • Ratio Q4 : Q1 = 180 : 120 = 3 : 2.

Example 4 — a fall, not a rise. Output went from 730 to 560. Change = (560 − 730) / 730 = −170/730 ≈ −23.3%. The base is 730, not 560.

6. Traps and gotchas

Trap Why it catches people How to avoid it
Wrong base for percentage change Dividing by the new value Always divide by the old value
Percentage of the wrong total Charts have a total and a subtotal Write "100% = …" before you start
Adding the wrong groups "Shorter than 170" means up to 170 Mark the cut-off group before adding
Mixing units Thousands against units Write the unit next to the table
Percentage points vs percent 8% → 10% is +2 points but +25% Read the question for which one is asked
Doing arithmetic with options far apart Wastes time Estimate and pick the closest option

7. Practice questions

More questions: QB-A7-data-interpretation.md.

1. [Ratio] Study the table.

Year Plant A (units) Plant B (units)
2019 350 570
2020 760 400
2021 230 820
2022 210 420
2023 420 770

What is the ratio of Plant A's output to Plant B's output in 2021, in its simplest form? a) 19:10 b) 24:82 c) 82:23 d) 23:82

2. [Average] Study the table.

Year Plant A (units) Plant B (units)
2019 260 500
2020 330 640
2021 260 870
2022 570 570
2023 500 310

What was Plant A's average yearly output over the five years? a) 1920 b) 578 c) 384 d) 415

3. [Pie chart as a table] A student scored 400 marks in total. The share of the total earned in each subject is shown. The pass mark in each subject is 50.

Subject Share of total marks
Geography 30%
Hindi 25%
Science 20%
English 15%
Maths 10%

In which subject did the student fail, and what is the difference between the best and the worst subject scores? a) Maths, 92 b) Maths, 68 c) Maths, 80 d) Hindi, 80

4. [Frequency table] The heights of 242 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 33
150–160 21
160–170 40
170–180 78
180–190 70

What percentage of the students are shorter than 170 cm? a) 54.65% b) 38.84% c) 16.53% d) 61.16%

5. [Frequency table] The heights of 325 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 116
150–160 20
160–170 68
170–180 95
180–190 26

What percentage of the students are shorter than 180 cm? a) 29.23% b) 100% c) 92% d) 8%

6. [Frequency table] The heights of 318 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 24
150–160 75
160–170 115
170–180 33
180–190 71

What percentage of the students are shorter than 160 cm? a) 23.58% b) 68.87% c) 40.08% d) 31.13%

7. [Ratio] Study the table.

Year Plant A (units) Plant B (units)
2019 280 640
2020 600 860
2021 560 540
2022 760 710
2023 400 470

What is the ratio of Plant A's output to Plant B's output in 2023, in its simplest form? a) 47:40 b) 41:47 c) 76:71 d) 40:47

8. [Frequency table] The heights of 364 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 96
150–160 39
160–170 83
170–180 71
180–190 75

What percentage of the students are shorter than 180 cm? a) 79.4% b) 19.51% c) 20.6% d) 100%

9. [Frequency table] The heights of 386 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 22
150–160 113
160–170 80
170–180 102
180–190 69

What percentage of the students are shorter than 170 cm? a) 55.7% b) 67.82% c) 44.3% d) 20.73%

10. [Frequency table] The heights of 312 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 22
150–160 33
160–170 99
170–180 111
180–190 47

What percentage of the students are shorter than 160 cm? a) 17.63% b) 10.58% c) 20.75% d) 82.37%

11. [Frequency table] The heights of 327 students are grouped as shown.

Height (cm) Students
140–150 81
150–160 66
160–170 116
170–180 23
180–190 41

What percentage of the students are shorter than 180 cm? a) 100% b) 87.46% c) 12.54% d) 7.03%

12. [Average] Study the table.

Year Plant A (units) Plant B (units)
2019 370 400
2020 610 330
2021 390 370
2022 350 790
2023 410 730

What was Plant A's average yearly output over the five years? a) 2130 b) 426 c) 440 d) 524

ANSWER KEY

  1. d — 230 : 820, divide both by 10 → 23:82.
  2. c — Total = 260 + 330 + 260 + 570 + 500 = 1920; average = 1920/5 = 384.
  3. c — Convert each share to marks (400 × share): Geography 120, Hindi 100, Science 80, English 60, Maths 40. Only Maths is below 50. Best − worst = 120 − 40 = 80.
  4. b — Students in the first 3 groups: 33 + 21 + 40 = 94. Percentage = 94/242 × 100 = 38.84%.
  5. c — Students in the first 4 groups: 116 + 20 + 68 + 95 = 299. Percentage = 299/325 × 100 = 92%.
  6. d — Students in the first 2 groups: 24 + 75 = 99. Percentage = 99/318 × 100 = 31.13%.
  7. d — 400 : 470, divide both by 10 → 40:47.
  8. a — Students in the first 4 groups: 96 + 39 + 83 + 71 = 289. Percentage = 289/364 × 100 = 79.4%.
  9. a — Students in the first 3 groups: 22 + 113 + 80 = 215. Percentage = 215/386 × 100 = 55.7%.
  10. a — Students in the first 2 groups: 22 + 33 = 55. Percentage = 55/312 × 100 = 17.63%.
  11. b — Students in the first 4 groups: 81 + 66 + 116 + 23 = 286. Percentage = 286/327 × 100 = 87.46%.
  12. b — Total = 370 + 610 + 390 + 350 + 410 = 2130; average = 2130/5 = 426.

8. Resources

  • https://www.indiabix.com/data-interpretation/table-charts/ — table-chart practice in the same style as the observed items.
  • https://www.indiabix.com/data-interpretation/pie-charts/ — pie charts; convert each slice to a table first.

9. Self-check

  1. Can you convert a pie chart to a table of marks in under a minute?
  2. Can you say which value is the base in "percentage change from 2020 to 2021"?
  3. Can you compute 77% from 308 out of 400 without a calculator?
  4. Can you explain percentage points against percent change with the 8% → 10% example?
  5. Do you estimate first when the options are far apart?

10. Sources

This file was written for this library. Infosys evidence: observed questions Q03, Q07 in ../data/questions-observed.csv; section structure and marks in ../research/03-pattern-synthesis.md §1; weightage, tier and hours in ../data/weightage.json (code A7). Confidence High. Practice questions in §7 and the bank were generated and checked by execution (brute force, simulation or inverse); see ../research/04-qa-report.md. Nothing here is a published Infosys syllabus.